CODE STUDIO · PROPOSALS · DECKS · PROTOTYPES

It writes it. Then it argues with itself about it.

Any model can produce a competent proposal. What Gaden does after that is the part nobody sells: it reviews its own work against the brief, judges it the way a peer would, and revises before you ever see it. A draft that looks finished is more dangerous than one that looks rough.

Hire Gaden See outreach
READ · DIRECT · BUILD · REVIEW · JUDGE

A REAL VERDICT ON A REAL DRAFT

This is what the critic pass returned

Not a mock-up. A brief asked for a nine-second vertical clip built on a single editorial device. The draft looked finished. It was not.

PEER VERDICT · REVISE · 0.46 · 9 ISSUES FOUND

CRITICAL

The core match-cut requirement is not met. Scene one shows the amount; scene two replaces it with a separate title. The amount does not become the reason it is stuck — it simply disappears.

CRITICAL

Five blocks with real content are still at opacity zero after 2600ms — the reveal never fired and this content is invisible to the reader.

MINOR

The call to action uses the accent colour on an accent background, making the label effectively invisible.

MINOR

The proof figures are internally inconsistent: the page displays one number while the source it cites states another.

6 CRITICAL 3 MINOR AUTO-REPAIRED RETURNED FOR REVISION

Every one of those is the kind of thing a client notices and nobody else catches. The reveal that silently never fired. The button that cannot be read. The number that does not match its own source.

FIVE PASSES, NOT ONE PROMPT

Reading is a different job from writing

READ
WHAT WAS ACTUALLY ASKED FOR
DIRECT
PALETTE, COPY AND STORY
BUILD
THE DOCUMENT ITSELF
REVIEW
CHECK IT AGAINST THE BRIEF
JUDGE
WOULD THIS SURVIVE A PEER

Composition, not a template with your logo on it

The Studio directs before it builds — the palette, the typographic scale, where the eye lands first and what it is allowed to see second. Output is real code, so the type stays sharp, the text stays editable and nothing is baked into an image you cannot change. A prototype's controls actually respond, because they are controls rather than a picture of controls.

TYPOGRAPHY DIRECTED REAL CODE OUT WORKING CONTROLS

WHAT COMES OUT

Client proposalsPricing · recommended tier
Pitch decks & one-pagersProblem → ask
Landing pagesLive, not a mock
Dashboards & reportsHero metric · KPIs · charts
Short animated clipsBuilt in timed layers

Motion built in layers, not a generated video

A short clip is composed the way an editor would cut it: elements enter on their own timing, one carrying the story across each transition. Because it is code and not a generated video, the words are your words, the type is your type, and rewriting a line means re-rendering rather than starting over. Record it and you have a nine-second post; change the copy and you have another one.

LAYERED TIMING YOUR TYPE · YOUR COPY RE-RENDERS ON EDIT

HOW A CLIP IS JUDGED

The critic pass does not ask whether it looks nice. It asks whether the device the brief demanded is actually there:

Does one element carry across the cutChecked
Is each scene a single messageChecked
Did every reveal actually fireChecked
Is any text invisible on its own backgroundChecked

WHY THE REVIEW PASS MATTERS

The first draft is not the problem. Trusting it is.

Generated work fails quietly. It looks professional, it reads well, and the thing that is wrong with it is invisible until it is in front of the person you were trying to impress.

GENERATE AND HAND OVER

What you find out later

  • Placeholder text still sitting in the final
  • A section that never became visible
  • A button the same colour as what is behind it
  • A figure that contradicts the source beside it
  • Two competing messages in a space that has room for one

GADEN STUDIO

What happens before you see it

  • Output checked against the brief that produced it
  • Every issue listed with a severity
  • Repairable problems fixed automatically
  • A verdict with a score, not a thumbs up
  • Work that fails comes back revised, not delivered

THE STUDIO, ANSWERED

What it makes and how it checks itself

What can Gaden Studio produce?

Client proposals with pricing, pitch decks, investor one-pagers, landing pages, dashboards, finance reports, working web prototypes where the controls actually respond, and short animated clips built in timed layers. Everything comes out as real code rather than an image, so the text stays editable and the typography stays yours.

Why does it review its own work?

Because a first draft that looks finished is more dangerous than one that looks rough. The review pass checks the output against the brief that produced it and catches the things nobody notices until a client does: placeholder text still visible, content that never became visible because a reveal did not fire, a call to action rendered in a colour that disappears into its own background, figures that contradict the source they cite.

What happens when it fails its own review?

It says so, with a score and the specific reasons, and revises rather than delivering. A verdict of revise on a competent-looking draft is the system working. The alternative is a document that looks professional and quietly fails to do the one thing it was asked to do.

Can it match our brand?

Yes. Palette, typography and layout are directed before anything is built, and the output is code you can keep editing. The library includes thirty-five email templates across ten palettes for the sending side, and documents can be produced on your own letterhead.

ALL-IN-ONE RECRUITMENT PLATFORM

From finding the client to paying your recruiter

The Studio is one room in it. Gaden finds the companies hiring, sources and screens the candidates, writes the proposals and contracts, books the interviews, invoices the fee and chases what is overdue — then pays every recruiter and partner out of the money that actually landed.

See what it costs Account intelligence

The Studio comes with Gaden Agency.